What did you think of this discussion?
The discussions were excellent mostly because of their content but also
because they were advanced so thoughtfully and reasonably by folk who knew
what they were talking about. Although they didn't know each other that
well, everyone tried to ensure the tenor of the meeting was to listen hard
as well as to advance viewpoints.
Are there any ideas that came out of this discussion that
surprised you?
I was not very surprised about what was discussed seeing as we were asked
to address the future. With the various problems advancing on mankind and
their gravity it is easy to become very depressed but the panel to a
man(woman) pointed out the sorts of positive changes that could be made to
mitigate many of these concerns. You will remember the old definition of an
optimist as "someone who doesn't understand what he reads in the newspaper".
The surprise was that everyone agreed about increasing density of housing
etc., developing attractive mass transit systems and the need to learn from
Europe how to cope with dense populations.
Did this discussion in any way change your outlook or perception
of the Okanagan's future?
It gave me some cause for hope because the generation perhaps two
generations after my own are so well informed as to what we need to do to
keep the Okanagan liveable. The question is can they persuade the
politicians fast enough to reverse some of the worst cases of poorly thought
and executed development so that the planners have good alternatives to work
with.
Participants Page xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Round Table |